This time; however, Halbig topped it off with some very strange and threatening statements.
To add to the oddness of Halbig's outburst, one of his Hoax group followers began screaming "I have been threatened by the Italian mafia in Connecticut for challenging Sandy Hook!" as Halbig paced back and forth with exaggerated hand gestures. Quite a pathetic episode. A Newtown insider watching Halbig's fit declared "You literally could hear the Benny Hill music playing in the background."
At the close of the hearing, Halbig crossed a new bridge of filth when he told Newtown Attorney Monte Frank "Were going to find Curtis Urbino. I tell you what, we are going to find Mr. Urbino. And Avielle Richman. We're going to find Avielle Richman, what do you think about that, Monte Frank? You're protecting these people. Avielle Richman, Avielle Richman. I'm going to find her and you are protecting them." His repetitive statement regarding a six year old girl was very chilling on an otherwise comical scene.
Sandy Hook Facts has no idea why Wolfgang is hunting 'Curtis Urbino'. We did find this article http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/15/nyregion/after-newtown-shooting-running-and-hoping-to-find-a-child-safe.html about a "Curtis Urbina"; however, it is still unclear why Wolfgang has targeted 'Curtis Urbino or if his target is the same person as in the article.
Avielle Richman, of course, is a six-year old girl that was murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School. It is unknown what prompted Halbig to taunt that he is hunting a deceased six year old little girl. Perhaps Halbig can explain his outbursts and delusional-type talk. We sincerely hope he does not represent a danger to others.
As to the hearing itself, the proposed hearing officers report discussed here:
was adopted with only a few minor scrivener error corrections.
Therefore, the commission has found:
- That the first complaint be dismissed in it's entirety.
- That all documents were provided to Halbig.
- That all documents were authentic.
- That all documents in the first complaint were provided in a timely precise, methodical manner.
- As to the second complaint only, the commission found that Newtown committed a "minor technical violation", in the words of Commissioner Streeter. The emails of Dawn Hochsprung were untimely. Newtown was ordered to be more timely in the future.
Halbig spent at least $20,000 of his donor's funds for this hearing and he failed to prove (or provide a shred of evidence) of all but a single minor technical misstep by Newtown. He will receive no additional documents.
Proof of Delivery:
Sandy Hook Facts was has received proof that Halbig's attorney, L. Kay Wilson, had been provided the hearing officers report on June 25, 2015.
If you recall, Halbig accused Sandy Hook Facts of the crime of slander because we dared publish opinion as free soeaking Americans on a matter of public record; publishing it before he had read ithe same Hearing Officers report.
Halbig stated, upon reviewing the Commissioner's Report on Sandy Hook Facts:
How is that possible since I and my Attorney Kate Wilson have not received those findings from your office or Commissioner Streeter?
If this is true that others are receiving this information before my attorney and I have a chance to review in order to prepare for the full commission hearing on July 8, 2015 which I do not even know if that is the real date.
I have purchased a $650.00 Airline ticket to be present in order to Challenge the Commissioners findings.
Please dear God tell me that your office does not operate that way.
I have been slandered as you will see without me or my attorney even having the opportunity to see it first.
That turns out to be untrue.
The Freedom of Information Commission released proof Halbig's attorney, L. Kay Wilson, received the ruling the report via email delivery confirmation:
Therefore, Halbig owes an apology to Sandy Hook Facts for accusing us of the crime of slander.